RECOMENDAMOS
- Real Instituto Elcano
- LATN
- Portal Estado Peruano

ARCHIVO EDITORIALES

POLITICA
Países
Organismos
Regiones
Situación General
Política Bilateral
Política Multilateral
Política Exterior
Otros temas

ECONOMIA
Inversiones y Comercio
Integración
Desarrollo
Negociaciones Económicas Multilaterales
Situación General
Otros temas

SEGURIDAD
Defensa
Seguridad Colectiva
Amenazas Globales
Situación General
Otros temas
DESARROLLO Y OTROS ASUNTOS
LINKS DE INTERES
Links del Perú
Links Internacionales

 


SEGURIDAD

FPIF Commentary
Apply "Libya Model" to Iran and Syria
By R. Bruce St John | October 21, 2004

The Bush administration does not appear to have learned any lessons from the Iraq imbroglio. The White House is now busy pursuing the same bellicose policies in Iran and Syria that led to the invasion of Iraq. While some commentators argue that the results of the Iraq War invalidate the preemptive strike strategy, this may prove to be more a reflection of wishful thinking than of Bush administration practice.

Isolation not Engagement
As the U.S. occupation of Iraq soured, the Bush administration charged Syria with multiple misdeeds which included hiding Iraqi weapons of mass destruction and facilitating the movement of “foreign fighters” into Iraq. More recently, President Bush in May 2004 imposed commercial and diplomatic sanctions on Damascus under the newly minted Syria Accountability and Lebanese Sovereignty Restoration Act. The Act called for the president to impose sanctions until certain conditions were met, including an end to support for terrorism, withdrawal of Syrian forces from Lebanon, and a freeze on the development of unconventional weapons.

In early September 2004, the United States cosponsored UN Security Council Resolution 1559, demanding the withdrawal of Syrian forces from Lebanon. One week later, William J. Burns, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for the Near East, in the course of a visit to Israel added that Syria must take “concrete action” in cooperating with the U.S. war on terrorism by halting support for militant Palestinian factions based in Damascus. Richard Armitage, U.S. Deputy Secretary of State, weighed in the following day, suggesting Syria bore some responsibility for the recent Be’er Sheva double bus bombing due to its ties to Hamas and Hezbollah. He offered no details or specific evidence in support of this conclusion.

Following his visit to Israel, Secretary Burns journeyed to Syria in mid-September 2004 where he told reporters it was time for Damascus to end its intervention in Lebanese internal affairs and withdraw its forces from Lebanon. About the same time, a State Department spokesperson indicated that the United States was considering the imposition of additional sanctions if Syria refused to quit Lebanon. Finally, the U.S. House of Representatives in mid-September 2004 passed Resolution 363, calling for an end to Syria’s “illegal occupation” of Lebanon. The resolution was cosponsored by the same lawmakers who had pushed for the Syria Accountability Act earlier in the year.

Tensions between Iran and the United States have also increased in recent months. The Bush administration’s current policy toward Iran, like its policy toward Syria, mixes condemnation, threat, and intimidation. The overall aim of the policy is isolation, not engagement. In a Hudson Institute speech on August 17, 2004, John R. Bolton, Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security, charged that Iran had been concealing “a large-scale, covert nuclear weapons program for over eighteen years.”

All of Iran’s WMD [weapons of mass destruction] efforts—chemical weapons, biological weapons, nuclear weapons, and ballistic missiles—pose grave threats to international security. Iran’s pursuit of these deadly weapons, despite its signature on treaties that ban them, marks it as a rogue state, and it will remain so until it completely, verifiably and irreversibly dismantles its WMD- related programs.
Later in the same speech, Bolton concluded: “Iran’s actions and statements do not bode well for the success of a negotiated approach to dealing with this issue.” He then quoted National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice who had remarked two weeks earlier on Fox News: “The Iranians have been trouble for a very long time. And it’s one reason that this regime has to be isolated in its bad behavior, not quote-unquote ‘engaged.’” Not surprisingly, the Bush administration’s approach sparked a strong reaction from Iran, prompting more bellicose rhetoric all around.

Challenges for Iran and Syria
This is not to suggest that many of the policies of both Iran and Syria are not cause for concern. Damascus needs to withdraw from Lebanon, cooperate in the stabilization of Iraq, support the war on terrorism, abandon alleged unconventional weapons programs, and cease its support for militant Palestinian groups. Syria should also be encouraged to pursue much needed domestic economic and political reforms.

Teheran needs to cooperate in the stabilization of Iraq, support the war on terrorism, and abandon any unconventional weapons programs. Most especially, any Iranian efforts to build a nuclear weapon must be stopped. Consequently, its recent announcement that it intends to process 37 metric tons of raw uranium into uranium hexafluoride is a special concern. Uranium hexafluoride, when spun in centrifuges, produces enriched uranium which can be used both to generate power and to make nuclear warheads. This issue of enrichment is a highly sensitive one for an international community seeking to determine if Iran is using its nuclear program for peaceful purposes, as Teheran insists, or building nuclear weapons, as the United States maintains.

The International Atomic Energy Agency has asked for more time to clarify Iranian intentions, but the Bush administration wants to refer the question to the UN Security Council, a move which would increase diplomatic pressure on Iran. As Under Secretary Bolton commented on September 10, 2004, at a Geneva press conference:

What we are saying is that Iran [’s] program, amounting as it does to a threat to international peace and security, is of sufficient gravity that we want to put the Iranian program at center stage, in the world spot light, in the forum of the Security Council, the principal political body of the United Nations, the body of the United Nations charged with dealing with threats to international peace and security.
Libyan Model
There is general agreement on the need for policy change in Damascus and Teheran. The contentious issue is how best to encourage and foster the desired change. Reminiscent of the build up to the invasion of Iraq, the Bush administration has been strong on rhetoric but absent a comprehensive, coherent plan to shape future events in either Iran or Syria. The United States has also failed, once again, to secure the full coordination and support of interested allies, like France, Germany, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union.

The prolonged negotiations which eventually led Libya in December 2003 to renounce unconventional weapons of its own “free will” offer a more productive model for dialogue with Iran and Syria than the “take no prisoner” approach being pursued by the Bush administration. Talks with Libya began in mid-1999 at a time when the United States was indicating it sought policy change but not regime change in Libya. In this initial stage, the involved parties agreed to tone down the rhetoric and begin a meaningful dialogue in pursuit of a step-by-step process.

These early negotiations with Libya were based from the outset on an explicit quid pro quo as Ambassador Martin Indyk, the U.S. Assistant Secretary of State who opened talks with Libya in mid-1999, later indicated in a Washington Post op-ed article. The talks aimed at Libya satisfying all of its obligations under applicable UN resolutions and were predicated on two conditions: Libyan agreement both to keep the negotiations quiet and to cease lobbying to have the UN sanctions permanently lifted. The Clinton administration elected not to pursue the unconventional weapons question at this time because its priority remained resolution of the Pan Am flight 103 issue.

Tripartite talks opened between Great Britain, Libya, and the United States in January 2001 were also based on a “script” which indicated what Libya must say and do to resolve the Pan Am flight 103 issue and to cause the UN sanctions to be lifted. According to Flynt Leverett, senior director for Middle East Politics at the National Security Council in 2002-03, the final round of negotiations with Libya, which began in March 2003, also centered on an explicit quid pro quo. In this case, the United States told Libya that, in return for a verifiable dismantlement of its unconventional weapons programs, Washington would lift its bilateral sanctions on Tripoli, perhaps before end 2004.

As the prolonged negotiations with Libya suggest, the United States needs to engage Iran and Syria on a broad range of interrelated issues, taking one step at a time. Narrow contact on the highly charged nuclear issue in the case of Iran or Syria’s occupation of Lebanon, tied to the Israeli occupation of the Golan Heights and Israel-Syria peace talks, is unlikely to work. On the contrary, Washington needs to engage Teheran on a basket of related issues, like Iranian fears of regime destabilization, a regional security architecture that includes Iran and its neighbors, and Iranian support for radical groups in Iraq, Lebanon, and Palestine. In turn, U.S. talks with Syria need to expand to include border and water issues with Israel and support for militant Palestinian groups as well as alleged unconventional weapons programs, support in stabilizing Iraq, and ongoing cooperation in the war on terrorism.

Unfortunately, it may prove difficult, if not impossible, for the White House to engage Iran and Syria on this wider list of issues. The linkage of U.S. policy under the Bush administration to Israeli policies in the region has become virtually seamless, and the Israeli government of Prime Minister Ariel Sharon has shown little inclination to negotiate with any of its neighbors, especially Syria. The respected Israeli newspaper, Haaretz, reported on September 14, 2004, that Sharon had rejected in 2003 a U.S. proposal for Israel to resume talks with Syria. Sharon was quoted by the newspaper as saying: “It was immediately taken off the agenda and they’re not raising it any more.” Syrian President Bashar Assad restated his desire to restart peace talks with Israel as recently as early September 2004.

Backwards to the Future
The Bush administration seems intent on polishing its macho image in the final weeks before the November presidential elections. Occasional reports of a lack of policy consensus within the administration on either Iran or Syria, which might suggest future room for engagement, lack credible foundation. White House policies toward both Iran and Syria, reflecting a failure to learn from the Iraqi experience, remain closely tied to Israeli interests in the region, specifically its policy of not allowing any Middle East neighbor to challenge its nuclear monopoly.

Where a process of engagement with Tripoli led to its renouncing unconventional weapons and rejoining the international community with no loss of life, Washington’s belligerent policy of isolation is provoking the opposite reaction in Damascus and Teheran. Both states have hunkered down under the verbal onslaught from the White House and shown little inclination or ability to cooperate on Washington’s terms. Unfortunately, if such pre-election antics prove a reliable guide, meaningful dialogue with either Damascus or Teheran would also appear unlikely in a second Bush administration. That brings us to the frightening prospect of a return to the Bush Doctrine and its preemptive strike strategy if President Bush is reelected.

(Ronald Bruce St John, an analyst for Foreign Policy in Focus, has published widely on Middle Eastern issues. His latest book on the region is Libya and the United States: Two Centuries of Strife (Penn Press, 2002).)

.:. subir
 


MARCO DE LA POLITICA EXTERIOR

ARCHIVO DOCUMENTOS 2008 - 2007 - 2006 - 2005 - 2004 - 2003

Acuerdo Nacional Política Sexta

DISCURSOS

Intervención del Vicecanciller Gonzalo Gutiérrez en la XII Conferencia de la UNCTAD
Ghana, 23 de de abril de 2008

Discurso del Vicecanciller Gonzalo Gutiérrez en el XXX aniversario de Oldepesca
4 de junio de 2008

Discurso del Vicecanciller Gonzalo Gutiérrez en la clausura del Foro de Negocios Perú-Ecuador
5 de junio de 2008

Discurso del Canciller José Antonio García Belaúnde en la 38a Asamblea General de la OEA
20 de junio de 2008

Mensaje a la Nación del Presidente Alan García 28 de julio de 2008

Discurso del Canciller José Antonio García Belaúnde en el el 187 aniversario del Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores
8 de agosto de 2008

Intervención del Canciller José Antonio García Belaúnde en la 63 Asamblea General de la ONU
29 de setiembre de 2008

Discurso del Presidente Alan García en clausura de año lectivo de Academia Diplomática
18 de diciembre de 2008

Discurso del Embajador Gonzalo Gutiérrez al dejar el cargo de Viceministro Secretario General de Relaciones Exteriores
20 de abril de 2009

Discurso del Embajador Néstor Popolizio al asumir el cargo de Viceministro Secretario General de Relaciones Exteriores
20 de abril de 2009

Discurso del Canciller en el 40 aniversario de la CAN
26 de mayo de 2009

Discurso del Canciller presentando al nuevo Secretario General de Relaciones Exteriores, Julio Muñoz 27 de mayo de 2009

Declaraciones del Canciller sobre expresiones del Presidente de Bolivia y asistencia a Unasur
3 de junio de 2009

Palabras del Canciller en el seminario sobre la política de migraciones de la Unión Europea.
23 de junio de 2009

COMUNICADOS Y DECLARACIONES

V Cumbre ALC-UE Declaración de Lima 16 de mayo de 2008

Perú-Brasil: visita oficial del Presidente Luis Inacio Lula da Silva Comunicado Conjunto 17 de mayo de 2008

El gobierno llamó a consultas al Embajador del Perú en Bolivia 30 de junio de 2008

El gobierno felicitó al gobierno de Colombia por el rescate de 15 rehenes secuestrados por las FARC 3 de julio de 2008

Canciller del Perú realiza visita de trabajo al Canciller de los Países Bajos
14 de julio de 2008

Vicecanciller de Paraguay realizó visita de trabajao al Perú
21 de octubre

Perú y Estados Unidos canjean deuda por conservación del ambiente
21 de octubre de 2008

Declaración presidencial
Perú-Ecuador
Machala, 24 de octubre de 2008

Perú-Argelia: 2a reunión del Mecanismo Bilateral de Consultas Políticas
30 de octubre de 2008

Perú y Colombia negociarán con la Unión Europea acuerdos de libre comercio
11 de noviembre de 2008

Comunicado conjunto entre el Perú y Corea del Sur
21 de noviembre de 2008

Comunicado conjunto entre el Perú y la República Popular China
19 de noviembre de 2008

Visita del Primer Ministro de Tailandia al Perú
24 de noviembre de 2008

Visita oficial del Canciller del Ecuador, Fander Falconí
Comunicado Conjunto, 12 de debrero de 2009

Declaración del Canciller José Antonio García Belaúnde sobre la presentación de la Memoria peruana ante la Corte Internacional de Justicia sobre el contencioso sobre delimitación marítima con Chile 18 de marzo de 2009

Comunicado en relación a las declaraciones del presidente de Bolivia, Evo Morales, en el Día del Mar
23 de marzo de 2009

Foro Perú-Italia
24 de marzo de 2009

Parlamento Europeo pedira la inclusión del MRTA en la lista de organizaciones terroristas
7 de mayo de 2009

Parlamento Europeo incluirá al MRTA en la lista de organizaciones terroristas
7 de mayo de 2009

Entrevistas al Canciller García Belaúnde sobre los hechos de Bagua y la controversia marítima peruano-chilena
11 de junio de 2009

Comunicado sobre los hechos de Honduras
28 de junio de 2009

Comentarios de Relaciones Exteriores a comunicado de CIDH
28 de junio de 2009

Comunicado Conjunto de Perú y Colombia sobre mediación en Honduras
17 de julio de 2009

ARTICULOS

NOTAS DE PRENSA

Canciller realiza visita oficial al Uruguay
1 de diciembre de 2008

Perú suscribió convención contra municiones de racimo
4 de diciembre de 2008

CIADI falla a favor del Perú en arbitraje solicitado por Aguaytía Energy
12 de diciembre de 2008

Presidente clausura año lectivo de la Academia Diplomática
18 de diciembre de 2008

Perú llama a cese de hostilidades en Gaza
28 de diciembre de 2008

Vicecanciller realiza visita a Holanda
20 de enero de 2008

Ministro de Energía y Minas de Argelia visita el Perú
29 de enero de 2009

Perú suscribe Estatuto sobre energía renovable
30 de enero de 2009

No hay reforma de Academia Diplomática
Enero de 2009

Perú y China ponen en vigencia tratado de asistencia judicial en materia penal
16 de febrero de 2009

Perú se incropora al Centro de desarrollo de la OCDE
18 de febrero de 2009

Oficina de Promoción Economía de Cancillería recibe certificación ISO
18 de febrero de 2009

Cancilleres de Perú y Japón dialogan sobre Acuerdo de Asociación Económica
24 de febrero de 2009

MInistros de Relaciones Exteriores y de Comercio Exterior inauguran en Japón muestra Expoperú
24 de febrero de 2009

Canciller inaugura en Japón muestra Gran Camino del Inca
24 de febrero de 2009

Canciller transmite a gobierno de Japón necesidad de medidas de proytección al migrante
26 de febrero de 2009

Canciller se entrevista en Tokio con empresarios japoneses para promover inversiones
26 de febrero de 2009

Canciller participa en reunión de cancilleres suramericanos y de países árabes en Egipto
2 de marzo de 2009

En el 2011 Perú será sede de cumbre de foro de países suramericanos y árabes
4 de marzo de 2009

El Vicecanciller brasileño realiza visita de trabajo al Perú en el marco del 2+2 peruano-brasileño
12 de marzo de 2009

Foro de Cooperación Perú-Italia
17 de marzo de 2009

3a reunión de autoridades peruano-ecuatorianas para el desminado fronterizo
16 de mrazo de 2009

Perú organizará cumbre de países suramericanos y árabes en 2011
31 de marzo de 2009

Perú confirma ingreso a Comité de Desarrollo de OCDE
27 de marzo de 2009

Perú e Israel suprimen visas a partir del 4 de julio
7 de abril de 2009

Peú expresa preocupación por lanazamiento de misil por Corea del Norte
8 de abril de 2009

El Perú deplora el discurso del presidente de Irán en la Conferencia de la ONU contra el Racismo
24 de abril de 2009

Canciller destaca en Praga importancia de energías limpias para países en desarrollo
13 de mayo de 2009

Canciller informa a empresarios europeos sobre seguridad para las inversiones en el Perú
15 de mayo de 2009

Se inicia en Lima reunión negociadora para consitución de la OROP
15 de mayo de 2009

Cancillería brasileña convoca concurso sobre monografías sobre el Perú
20 de mayo de 2009

Perú rechaza ensayo nuclear de Corea del Norte
25 de mayo de 2009

Preocupación por el Premio Nobel Aung San Su Kyi
28 de mayo de 2009

Perú deposita en ONU ratificación de.tratado sobre lucha contra el terrorismo nuclear 3 de junio de 2009

Representante Permanente del Perú ante la OEA explica sucesos de Bagua
9 de junio de 2009

Comentarios al comunicado de la Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos 9 de junio de 2009

Funcionario de la Comisión Europea realiza visita oficial al Perú 22 de junio de 2009

Entrevista del Canciller José Antonio García Belaúnde con Reuters 16 de junio de 2009

Visita oficial del Director General Adjunto para América Latina y Asia de la Comisión Europea
2 de julio de 2009

Canciller agradece a Ecuador por restitución de preferencias andinas
10 de julio de 2009

Cancilleres de Perú y Colombia se reunirán en la frontera para clausurar el programa " Acción Cívica Binacional"
14 de julio de 2009

Cumbre NO AL apoya cumbre ASPA en Perú en 2011
17 de julio de 2009

    CONTEXTO.org® 2003 - Derechos reservados    
Host & Design: